The Liberty Amendment – its origin and progress

"God grants Liberty only to those who love it and are always ready to guard it and defend it." – Daniel Webster

Jefferson had visions of serious problems with power concentrated in a large central government:

"Our country is too large to have all its affairs directed by a single government. Public servants, at such a distance, and from under the eye of their constituents, must, from the circumstances of distance, be unable to administer and overlook all the details necessary for the good government of the citizens; and the same circumstances, rendering detection impossible to their constituents, will invite the public agents to corruption, plunder, and waste.

"The true theory of our Constitution is surely the wisest and best, that the States are independent as to everything within themselves, and united as to everything respecting foreign nations. ... Let the General Government be reduced to foreign concerns only, and let our affairs be disentangled from those of all other nations, except as to commerce, which if merchants are left free to manage for themselves, our General Government may be reduced to a very simple organization, and a very inexpensive one -- a few plain duties to be performed by a few servants."

225 years in the deconstruction of our Constitution has seriously eroded the constitutional balance of powers

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights do not list every type of law, executive order or department rule which is permitted, nor every type which is not permitted under the terms of these documents. This would seem to leave a wide field for discretionary action and interpretation between specifically delegated powers and specifically prohibited powers. The Tenth Amendment was intended to eliminate this wide field, by stating that all powers not specifically delegated to the Federal Government are reserved to the States and to the people. However, this limitation has been ignored to such an extreme that concerned citizens have brought about:

The Liberty Amendment has progressed toward ratification to a degree not widely known by the public.

Nine states have endorsed the Liberty Amendment by passing the necessary resolutions requesting the amendment be submitted to the states for ratification. The endorsement in nearly all state legislatures was bi-partisan and close to unanimous. Again, these states are:

Wyoming • Nevada • Texas • Louisiana • Georgia • South Carolina • Mississippi • Arizona • Indiana

A misconception too readily accepted by many, taken advantage of by many in government and, heard much too often today, has contributed to the creation of the Liberty Amendment:

The government of the United States can do anything not specifically prohibited by the constitution!

When the Attorney General of the United States made this statement in 1944, a number of newspapers reported it and many people were very disturbed by it, because they recognized it for what it was: a claim of virtually absolute power, a claim made by every tyrant in history.

The occasion was a threatened strike at Montgomery Ward and Company. The company refused to recognize the threat. The Government ordered the Army to seize the company's principal offices and stores in Chicago, although Montgomery, Ward operated only a small retail business and was not engaged in any war production. Mr. Sewell Avery, chairman of the board of Montgomery, Ward and Company, denied that the Government had any legal power to make this seizure, and refused to leave his office. On orders from the Government, some soldiers carried him out of his office ---chair and all--- and deposited him on the sidewalk, where all hands had their pictures taken. A few may recall these pictures in the newspapers They created a good deal of excitement for a week or more. Then the Attorney General issued his official opinion, part of which is quoted above.

With World War II going on, the general public interest in Mr. Avery's problems soon died down. Yet, to one man at least this incident and the official justification for it, marked a turning point To him this was the last straw on top of thousands of other cases of usurpation of power, in direct negation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. He recognized the Attorney General's statement as a direct denial of the inherent rights of people.

The author of the Liberty Amendment

The man was Willis E. Stone, an industrial engineer. Born in Denver Colorado, he was a descendant of Ralph Waldo Emerson, the philosopher, and of Thomas Stone, a signer of the Declaration of Independence.

In the early 1920s he conducted an economic survey of the advantages to Southern California, Nevada and Arizona of using the water and power resources of the Colorado River. This survey was published widely, and encouraged the rapid development of the Hoover Dam as a joint project of the three States.

After serving in World War I, he moved to Los Angeles California, where he was successfully engaged in industrial engineering, advertising and marketing until 1949, when he began to devote full time and attention to the Liberty Amendment

Timeline

It cannot be overemphasized that the Liberty Amendment to the Constitution, as written, is more urgently needed today than it was 40 or 50 years ago. With the temptation to tighten relations with the United Nations, and depend upon that organization for support and approval of our "War on Terror", the need to fight to save our sovereignty increases exponentially. Section 2 of the Liberty Amendment alone could stop this relentless momentum toward the destruction of our individual Sovereignty, the sovereignty of our States and of the United States of America.

With all this said, we can only hope that God will grant the Representatives in the remainder of our State governments the awareness, the courage and motivation to accept their responsibility as the only means of restoring this Great Nation to its once-recognized position in the world as a bastion of freedom. We inherited a Nation with the power of government limited by a Constitution and the power flowing from the people to the government, not from government to the people, and the protection of Individual Liberty was the paramount purpose of its Constitutional Central Government.

May God Bless America, Once Again, and Help Our People Resist the Evil of Tyranny, wherever it arises, with a renewed "Thunderous Demand" that every State Legislature Endorse and Send Certified Resolutions of the Approval to Congress, and Ultimately, Ratify the Liberty Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America.

We now have resolutions by nine states requesting that the Liberty Amendment be submitted to the states for ratification.

"A good administration in a republican government, ... securing to us our dearest rights and the practical enjoyment of all our liberties, ... can never fail to give consolation to the friends of free government, and mortification to its enemies." --Thomas Jefferson: Reply to Rhode Island Republicans, 1809.

We in the United States possess two fundamental advantages both of which earlier civilizations did not have jointly: constituionalism and free enterprise. We can renew the effectiveness of our Constitution and the wise divisions of powers between our various levels and branches of government. We can restore the efficiency of our economy. The Liberty Amendment will accomplish both of these purposes, by reducing the functions and powers of the Federal Government, by restoring the abilities of people to take care of themselves without reliance on government, and by curtailing destructive intervention in our free enterprise economy. Thus, we have the means, the tools, for passing on to our children and their children the priceless constitutional and economic heritage our forefathers bequested to us. All we need is the will and the understanding to do it, and the courage and conviction to act intelligently

An Equally important intent of the amendment is to clarify and confirm once-and-for-all the sovereignty of the People, the States and the United States. The Liberty Amendment confirms the supremacy of the Constitution over all treaties or agreements, and precludes the implementation by Executive Order or Regulation of any terms of any treaties or agreements, not constitutional and not ratified by the Senate.

The Liberty Amendment, introduced in every Congress from 1957 to 1963, resulted in an ever-mounting counterattack from federal bureaucrats. But, with these ever increasing objections by the federal bureaucracy, the citizens became more and more aware of the forces against them, and the support of the amendment grew more rapidly with each year. By February 1962, the process of appeal by State legislatures for an endorsement resolution was well under way, and by then the approval had been accomplished in six States, almost unanimously.

When more than 20 states had approved by resolution, it was to be forwarded to Congress for their choice of proposing the amendment for ratification or calling a convention for that purpose. It is more than likely that events of national crisis, i.e. the Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy's assassination, the initiation of Johnson's "great society" followed by the escalation and turmoil of the Vietnam War, all contributed to slowing the State endorsement and ratification process of the Amendment during these decades.

It is also very likely that this Constitutional alternative process of two-thirds of the States proposing an amendment, such as the Liberty Amendment, to Congress, and its ratification by three-fourths of the States, remains, today, the only possible way of reforming the federal government to its Constitutional limits. It is our belief, that those Congressmen with the motivation and courage to initiate an urgent and substantial downsizing of government activities and loss of their own power, is limited at present to Congressman Ron Paul, and the Liberty Committee. We believe they will need the added persuasion of a heavy endorsement of the Liberty Amendment by at least 20 or 25 State Legislatures, before Congress is forced to submit it to the States for ratification.

[Main Page]


10/16/06 Webmaster